Encoders play a vital role in closed-loop motion control, enhancing precision, reliability, and efficiency for machinery and robotics. In this article, we'll explore how optical, magnetic, and capacitive encoders function and provide some helpful tips for choosing the right one.
Firstly, encoders are usually installed on the rear shaft of a motor to monitor its rotation. While both optical and magnetic encoders are similar, we’ll focus mainly on rotary encoders in this discussion.
Each type of encoder tracks the shaft’s rotation differently, but all produce a pulse train signal as the motor shaft turns. By performing some basic calculations, the number of pulses can indicate the motor shaft's position and how far it has rotated from its initial position. For instance, if the encoder has a resolution of 200 pulses per revolution and outputs 200 pulses, it means the motor shaft has completed one full rotation. The frequency of the pulses (in Hz) tells us how fast the shaft is rotating, while the direction depends on which channel (A or B phase) leads the other. That’s the quick overview.
Now, let’s delve deeper into the different types of encoders and their functionalities.
**Optical Encoders: The Most Common**
Optical encoders are the most widely used type due to their high precision, accuracy, and resolution. They rely on electrically powered light emitters and receivers, meaning they need a constant power supply to function.
In a traditional "transmissive" optical encoder, typically found on stepper motors, brushless motors, or servo motors, the key components include a light emitter (like an LED), a code wheel, a light receiver (photo sensor), a power circuit, and an output circuit. With these elements, motion can be detected as follows:
The code wheel is essentially a wheel with slits cut near its outer edge. As the code wheel rotates with the motor shaft, the light emitted by the stationary light source either passes through the slits or is blocked by the code wheel. From the photo sensor’s perspective, this creates a continuous stream of binary “on/off†pulses of light. The output circuit generates an ON signal when light shines through and an OFF signal when it is blocked. A motor driver, PLC, or HMI can interpret this pulsetrain signal and convert it into steps, degrees, inches, or millimeters for easier comprehension of the motor shaft's position and movement. Additional corrections can also be made in real-time.
There are several classifications of optical encoders:
- **Transmissive vs Reflective**: Traditionally, optical encoders are transmissive, meaning the LED light must shine through the transmissive disk (code wheel) to reach the photo sensor. Recently, reflective disks have replaced transmissive ones to save space.
- **Incremental vs Absolute**: Incremental encoders detect and output a pulse signal but only track changes relative to a home position. This is because the code wheel in an incremental encoder doesn’t offer unique position values; every position is treated the same. If there’s a third Z or index channel, it can serve as an absolute position to reference a starting home position or count revolutions.
Absolute encoders, on the other hand, feature a unique pattern for each position and can provide multiple bits of information, allowing the controller to know the precise position at any given moment—even after a power loss. These are crucial for applications demanding high accuracy and repeatability, such as robotics and CNC machines.
**Magnetic Encoders: The Emerging Option**
Unlike optical encoders, magnetic encoders don’t use a light emitter or receiver but still employ a code wheel and a sensor. Instead of slits, the code wheel features alternating north and south pole magnets along its outer edge. The magnetic sensor detects changes in magnetic polarity as the poles pass by, resulting in the same output—pulses sent to a PLC or HMI. Since there’s no need to power a light emitter and receiver, magnetic encoders consume less energy than optical ones.
Magnetic encoders are more resilient than optical encoders, performing better in humid, dusty, or dirty environments. However, they might not function optimally in settings with magnetic interference. Available in rotary, linear, incremental, and absolute types, magnetic encoders require multiple magnetic disks to track absolute positions.
**Capacitive Encoders: The Newcomer**
Capacitive encoders represent a newer technology offering similar environmental benefits as magnetic encoders. According to US Digital, this type of encoder detects changes in capacitance using a high-frequency reference signal and converts the signal into pulses. The setup includes a transmitter, a rotor, and a receiver. The rotor usually has a pattern etched into it or a uniquely shaped design. As the rotor moves between the transmitter and the receiver, the pattern modulates the high-frequency signal generated by the transmitter. The receiver reads the modulated signal and translates it into a pulse signal.
Similar to optical encoders, capacitive encoders are vulnerable to noise and electrical interference, necessitating additional protective measures. They also have a low current draw and come in rotary, linear, incremental, and absolute versions. To enable capacitive encoders to track absolute positions, multiple capacitive disks are required.
In conclusion, selecting the right encoder depends on your specific application requirements, including environmental conditions, precision needs, and cost considerations. Understanding the differences between optical, magnetic, and capacitive encoders will help ensure optimal performance and longevity of your equipment.
Solenoid Diverter Valve,Reversing Valve,Directional Control Valve,Direction Control Valves
Huaian Hy-waloil Machinery Co.,Ltd , https://www.hywaloil.com